Whiskerino 2009

Ongoing Challenge: Comment on as many users as possible.

« »
  • posted: February 03 @ 5:11pm
obscured via litigation

Comments

Ploafmaster says:
Eyes REDACTED.
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 5:14pm -
miguelito says:
was this run in the papers circa 1976?
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 5:37pm -
Yogi Beard says:
I'm just going to assume that the voice I read the caption in has been digitally altered to protect the innocent.
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 5:45pm -
Ned Kelly says:
im gonna print this out and then draw in eyes
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 5:49pm -
Andrew says:
I told you not to run over all those bald eagles.
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 5:52pm -
mattyc says:
you got arresting for stomping midgets didn't you?
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 6:32pm -
Ozzy Nelson says:
Hey Mrs. Midwestern English major, I don't believe you used the word "via" in the correct context here. I believe the correct English would be "obscured pending litigation."

Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 7:44pm -
A Son of Fergus says:
Sweet glasses. Wait.
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 7:47pm -
ThatGuy says:
@ozzynelson MVC

And I think he's right about that by the way.
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 7:51pm -
keifel says:
the eyes are hidden to protect the guilty
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 8:20pm -
JamesC says:
@ozzynelson and @ThatGuy unless the litigation causes the obscuration, which is the case. pending would mean i don't have my eyes covered, idiot.
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 8:32pm -
Ozzy Nelson says:
you, @thatguy and me all know you don't know what the fuck you are talking about
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 8:46pm -
Dschonn says:
puer ambulat ab via domum
Posted: Feb 3rd, 2010 - 10:43pm -
mackle says:
this is begging for a @jnonfiction attack, you know that, right?
Posted: Feb 4th, 2010 - 10:51am -
XscatteredshowersX says:
ur a good guy
Posted: Feb 4th, 2010 - 2:44pm -
Site closed!
Whiskerino. fin.